Renault Laguna 2005 vs Volvo V50 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Laguna engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo V50. Due to the lower power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.0 | |
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Laguna consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
Renault Laguna is 19 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 417 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1307 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`850 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 6.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |