Renault Laguna 2006 vs Volvo V70 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is more dynamic to drive. Renault Laguna engine produces 12 HP more power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volvo V70. Thanks to more power Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Laguna consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Laguna consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC70, Volvo C30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2006 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is smaller. Renault Laguna is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 475 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1641 litres | |
| Renault Laguna has 10 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Renault Laguna has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V70 has serious deffects in 265 percent more cases than Renault Laguna, so Renault Laguna quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 8.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |