Renault Laguna 2005 vs Peugeot 307 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is more dynamic to drive. Renault Laguna engine produces 60 HP more power than Peugeot 307, whereas torque is 135 NM more than Peugeot 307. Thanks to more power Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 307 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5, Peugeot 306 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2005 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is larger, but lower. Renault Laguna is 28 cm longer than the Peugeot 307, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Laguna is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 475 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1540 litres | |
|
Renault Laguna has more luggage capacity. Renault Laguna has 135 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`984 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Peugeot 307 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Peugeot 307, so Peugeot 307 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 6.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Peugeot 307 has
| |