Renault Laguna 2005 vs Volvo XC70 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 285 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC70 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Laguna engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo XC70, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Volvo XC70. Due to the lower power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 11.7 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC70 2000: Automatic four-wheel drive with torque transfer to rear axle via viscous clutch when front wheels slip. Electronic traction control on front wheels (TRACS), which operates at speeds up to 40 km/h (25 mph) | |||
| Renault Laguna 2005 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Laguna 2005 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is smaller. Renault Laguna is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo XC70, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 475 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1641 litres | |
| Renault Laguna has 10 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70, which means Renault Laguna can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Renault Laguna has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC70 has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Renault Laguna, so Renault Laguna quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |