Renault Laguna 2007 vs Audi A6 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is more dynamic to drive. Renault Laguna engine produces 35 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Audi A6. Thanks to more power Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
| By specification Renault Laguna consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2007 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is smaller. Renault Laguna is 13 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 565 litres | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Renault Laguna has 57 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 1 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Renault Laguna can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`063 | 2`240 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Audi A6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi A6, so Audi A6 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Audi A6 has
| |