Renault Laguna 2007 vs Volvo V70 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Laguna engine produces 35 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2007 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. Volvo V70 2007 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular. However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo V70 2007 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is smaller. Renault Laguna is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 575 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Renault Laguna has 67 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo V70, which means Renault Laguna can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`107 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volvo V70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volvo V70, so Volvo V70 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 4600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |