Renault Laguna 2007 vs Ford Mondeo 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is more dynamic to drive. Renault Laguna engine produces 60 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 95 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2007 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Laguna and Ford Mondeo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1700 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Renault Laguna has 32 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`107 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford Mondeo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo, so Ford Mondeo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 7.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |