Renault Laguna 2007 vs Audi A6 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Laguna engine produces 10 HP less power than Audi A6, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is smaller. Renault Laguna is 13 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 565 litres | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Renault Laguna has 57 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 1 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Renault Laguna can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`051 | 2`240 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Audi A6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi A6, so Audi A6 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Audi A6 has
| |