Renault Laguna 2010 vs Ford Mondeo 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is more dynamic to drive. Renault Laguna engine produces 17 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
| 970 km with real consumption | 1110 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is smaller. Renault Laguna is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1680 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Laguna has 19 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The Ford Mondeo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 1.1 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Renault Laguna can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 2`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Laguna has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Renault Laguna, so Renault Laguna quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |