Renault Laguna 2010 vs Subaru Outback 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 229 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Renault Laguna engine produces 27 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 34 NM less than Subaru Outback. Despite less power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 8.4 | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Laguna consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.61 m | |
| Renault Laguna is 3 cm longer than the Subaru Outback, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Laguna is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 526 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Laguna has 18 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Outback. This could mean that the Renault Laguna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.2 metres less than that of the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |