Renault Laguna 2010 vs Subaru Outback 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 229 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving. Renault Laguna engine produces 57 HP less power than Subaru Outback, but torque is 11 NM more than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 8.4 | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Laguna consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.61 m | |
| Renault Laguna is 3 cm longer than the Subaru Outback, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Laguna is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 526 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Laguna has 18 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Outback. This could mean that the Renault Laguna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.2 metres less than that of the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`957 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |