Renault Laguna 2010 vs Ford Mondeo 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Renault Laguna engine produces 53 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Laguna consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Laguna consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1600 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
| 1130 km with real consumption | 1110 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is smaller. Renault Laguna is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1680 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Laguna has 19 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The Ford Mondeo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Renault Laguna can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`957 | 2`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Laguna has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Renault Laguna, so Renault Laguna quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |