Renault Laguna 2013 vs Citroen C5 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 138 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is more dynamic to drive. Renault Laguna engine produces 37 HP more power than Citroen C5, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Citroen C5. Thanks to more power Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.8 | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Laguna consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1410 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Peugeot 407, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. Citroen C5 2010 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Citroen C5 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is smaller. Renault Laguna is 3 cm shorter than the Citroen C5, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 505 litres | |
| Renault Laguna has 3 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.4 metres less than that of the Citroen C5, which means Renault Laguna can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`107 | 2`326 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
| |