Renault Laguna 2013 vs Subaru Outback 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving. Renault Laguna engine produces 40 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1580 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1740 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 1210 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Legacy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Laguna 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.61 m | |
| Renault Laguna is 1 cm longer than the Subaru Outback, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Laguna is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 526 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1593 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Laguna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.1 metres more than that of the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`957 kg | 2`100 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |