Renault Laguna 2005 vs Skoda Octavia 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is more dynamic to drive. Renault Laguna engine produces 60 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Skoda Octavia. Thanks to more power Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.3 | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Laguna consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Laguna is 7 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Skoda Octavia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Skoda Octavia, so Skoda Octavia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 5.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |