Renault Laguna 2006 vs Skoda Octavia 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is more dynamic to drive. Renault Laguna engine produces 40 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Skoda Octavia. Thanks to more power Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.3 | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Laguna consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is larger. Renault Laguna is 7 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Renault Laguna has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Octavia has serious deffects in 235 percent more cases than Renault Laguna, so Renault Laguna quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 5.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |