Renault Laguna 2008 vs Peugeot 3008 2009
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is more dynamic to drive. Renault Laguna engine produces 30 HP more power than Peugeot 3008, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Peugeot 3008. Thanks to more power Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C4 Picasso, Citroen C4, Peugeot 5008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2008 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.64 m | |
| Renault Laguna is 44 cm longer than the Peugeot 3008, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1241 litres | |
| Renault Laguna has 18 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`089 | 2`080 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Peugeot 3008 has
| |