Renault Laguna 2008 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2007
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is more dynamic to drive. Renault Laguna engine produces 40 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Thanks to more power Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2008 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is larger, but lower. Renault Laguna is 13 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 5 cm wider, while the height of Renault Laguna is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Renault Laguna has more luggage capacity. Renault Laguna has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means Renault Laguna can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`089 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |