Renault Laguna 2007 vs Peugeot 407 2004
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 407 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Laguna engine produces 6 HP less power than Peugeot 407, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Laguna consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 407, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Laguna consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 407. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2007 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. Peugeot 407 2004 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Peugeot 407 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Laguna is 2 cm longer than the Peugeot 407, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Laguna is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 407 litres | |
|
Renault Laguna has more luggage capacity. Renault Laguna has 43 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 407. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 407, which means Renault Laguna can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`025 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Peugeot 407 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Peugeot 407, so Peugeot 407 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Peugeot 407 has
| |