Renault Laguna 2008 vs Peugeot 3008 2010
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 205 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is more dynamic to drive. Renault Laguna engine produces 49 HP more power than Peugeot 3008, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Peugeot 3008. Thanks to more power Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.7 | |
|
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Laguna consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Renault Megane | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 3008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.64 m | |
| Renault Laguna is 34 cm longer than the Peugeot 3008, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1241 litres | |
| Renault Laguna has 18 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`022 | 2`020 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Peugeot 3008 has
| |