Renault Laguna 2007 vs Renault Megane 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Renault Laguna engine produces 40 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Laguna consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Laguna consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Espace | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Grand Espace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2007 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Laguna 2007 2.0 engine Renault Megane 2008 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Megane 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
| Renault Laguna is 40 cm longer than the Renault Megane, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Laguna is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 372 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1162 litres | |
|
Renault Laguna has more luggage capacity. Renault Laguna has 78 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Megane. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`919 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Laguna has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Megane, so Renault Laguna quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Renault Megane has
| |