Renault Laguna 2010 vs Renault Scenic 2013
Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 175 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 360 NM | 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Renault Laguna is more dynamic to drive. Renault Laguna engine produces 25 HP more power than Renault Scenic, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.9 | |
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Laguna consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
1240 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.64 m | |
Renault Laguna is 33 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 20 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1870 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Renault Laguna has 20 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. This could mean that the Renault Laguna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`076 | 2`099 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 3800 | 6000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
| |