Renault Laguna 2010 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2012
Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
Renault Laguna and Renault Grand Scenic have the same engine power, but Renault Laguna torque is 20 NM less than Renault Grand Scenic. Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.1 | |
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Laguna consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 1460 km in combined cycle | |
1650 km on highway | 1530 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.65 m | |
Renault Laguna is 12 cm longer than the Renault Grand Scenic, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 20 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 645 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 645 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 450 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2063 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Grand Scenic. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`936 | 2`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3800 | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |