Renault Laguna 2010 vs Renault Megane 2013
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Renault Laguna engine produces 80 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 145 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Laguna consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Megane, Renault Grand Scenic | Used also on Renault Laguna | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Laguna is 14 cm longer than the Renault Megane, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Laguna is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1595 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Laguna has 74 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. This could mean that the Renault Laguna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Megane. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`919 | 1`909 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Laguna has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Renault Laguna, so Renault Laguna quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Renault Megane has
| |