Renault Laguna 2010 vs Skoda Octavia 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Renault Laguna) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Skoda Octavia) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Renault Laguna and Skoda Octavia have the same engine power, but Renault Laguna torque is 125 NM less than Skoda Octavia. Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is larger. Renault Laguna is 13 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1350 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Laguna has 110 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. This could mean that the Renault Laguna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Renault Laguna can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`919 | 1`995 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Laguna has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Octavia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Laguna, so Renault Laguna quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |