Renault Laguna 2010 vs Renault Scenic 2012
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Renault Laguna and Renault Scenic have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 8.1 | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Laguna consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Megane, Renault Grand Scenic | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Renault Koleos | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Renault Laguna engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.64 m | |
| Renault Laguna is 33 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1870 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Laguna has 20 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. This could mean that the Renault Laguna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`919 | 1`973 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |