Renault Laguna 2010 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2012
Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 195 NM | 195 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
Renault Laguna and Renault Grand Scenic have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 8.1 | |
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Laguna consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
1080 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.65 m | |
Renault Laguna is 12 cm longer than the Renault Grand Scenic, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 20 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 645 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 645 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 450 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2063 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Grand Scenic. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`919 | 2`203 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3800 | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
| |