Renault Laguna 2010 vs Chevrolet Cruze 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is more dynamic to drive. Renault Laguna engine produces 31 HP more power than Chevrolet Cruze, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Chevrolet Cruze. Thanks to more power Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 8.3 | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Laguna consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Cruze, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Laguna is 19 cm longer than the Chevrolet Cruze, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Laguna is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 413 litres | |
|
Renault Laguna has more luggage capacity. Renault Laguna has 37 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Cruze. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Cruze. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`919 | 1`828 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Renault Laguna has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Cruze has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Renault Laguna, so Renault Laguna quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
| |