Renault Laguna 2013 vs Skoda Superb 2013
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Renault Laguna engine produces 35 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Skoda Superb. Thanks to more power Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Laguna consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1410 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is smaller. Renault Laguna is 14 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Laguna is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 565 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Renault Laguna has 115 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.4 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Renault Laguna can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`076 | 2`117 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |