Renault Laguna 2013 vs Skoda Octavia 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Renault Laguna engine produces 25 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Skoda Octavia. Despite the higher power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1410 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Laguna is 4 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Laguna is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 590 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1580 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Laguna has 140 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. This could mean that the Renault Laguna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`076 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Laguna has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Octavia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Laguna, so Renault Laguna quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |