Renault Laguna 2013 vs Renault Megane 2012

 
Renault Laguna
2013 - 2015
Renault Megane
2012 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.6 Petrol
Diesel (Renault Laguna) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Renault Megane) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 110 HP106 HP
Torque: 240 NM151 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds11.7 seconds
Renault Laguna engine produces 4 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 89 NM more than Renault Megane. Despite the higher power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.26.8
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Renault Laguna consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1610 km in combined cycle880 km in combined cycle
1830 km on highway1110 km on highway
Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Engine production duration: 8 years27 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan JukeInstalled on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Renault Laguna 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ...  More about Renault Laguna 2013 1.5 engine 

Renault Megane 2012 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not particularly demanding on fuel quality. The most critical ...  More about Renault Megane 2012 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.30 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Renault Laguna is larger, but slightly lower.
Renault Laguna is 40 cm longer than the Renault Megane, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Laguna is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 450 litres368 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1162 litres
Renault Laguna has more luggage capacity.
Renault Laguna has 82 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.1 meters
Gross weight: 1`936 kg1`720 kg
Net weight:1`310 kg1`215 kg
Load capacity:626 kg505 kg
Renault Laguna load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Renault Megane. Therefore, Renault Laguna is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

low
Renault Laguna has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Renault Laguna, so Renault Laguna quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 40003200
Pros and Cons: Renault Laguna has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • fewer faults
Renault Megane has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv