Renault Laguna 2013 vs Skoda Superb 2013
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is a more dynamic driving. Renault Laguna engine produces 30 HP less power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Skoda Superb. Due to the lower power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1610 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1830 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 1210 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Laguna 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is smaller. Renault Laguna is 14 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Laguna is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 565 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Renault Laguna has 115 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.4 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Renault Laguna can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`936 | 2`117 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |