Renault Laguna 2013 vs Skoda Rapid 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Skoda Rapid is a more dynamic driving. Renault Laguna engine produces 5 HP less power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Skoda Rapid. Due to the lower power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1610 km in combined cycle | 1440 km in combined cycle | |
| 1830 km on highway | 1660 km on highway | ||
| 1210 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Laguna 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Laguna is 21 cm longer than the Skoda Rapid, 11 cm wider, while the height of Renault Laguna is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1490 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Laguna has 100 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. This could mean that the Renault Laguna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Renault Laguna can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`936 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Skoda Rapid has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Rapid quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |