Renault Laguna 2013 vs Nissan Pulsar 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Renault Laguna) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan Pulsar) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is more dynamic to drive. Renault Laguna engine produces 5 HP less power than Nissan Pulsar, but torque is 75 NM more than Nissan Pulsar. Despite less power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pulsar, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pulsar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1610 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1830 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 1210 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Laguna 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is larger, but lower. Renault Laguna is 31 cm longer than the Nissan Pulsar, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Laguna is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 385 litres | |
|
Renault Laguna has more luggage capacity. Renault Laguna has 65 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Pulsar. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.9 metres more than that of the Nissan Pulsar, which means Renault Laguna can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`936 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Nissan Pulsar has
| |