Renault Laguna 2008 vs Mazda 3 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.5 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 100 - 187 HP | |
Torque: | 270 - 450 NM | 144 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 9.8 seconds | 8.1 - 13.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 10.0 | 4.1 - 7.6 | |
Renault Laguna petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Renault Laguna equipped with diesel engines consume 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.47 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.45 m | |
Renault Laguna is larger, but lower. Renault Laguna is 17 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Laguna is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 423 litres | 364 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1263 litres | |
Renault Laguna has more luggage capacity. Renault Laguna has 59 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Renault Laguna can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`980 | ~ 1`864 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 10 800 | 7800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |