Renault Laguna 2008 vs Mazda 3 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Renault Laguna
2008 - 2012
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Body: CoupeHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 3.51.5 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 150 - 240 HP100 - 187 HP
Torque: 270 - 450 NM144 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 - 9.8 seconds8.1 - 13.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.9 - 10.04.1 - 7.6
Renault Laguna petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Renault Laguna equipped with diesel engines consume 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.47 m
Width: 1.83 m1.79 m
Height: 1.40 m1.45 m
Renault Laguna is larger, but lower.
Renault Laguna is 17 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Laguna is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 423 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1263 litres
Renault Laguna has more luggage capacity.
Renault Laguna has 59 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Renault Laguna can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`980~ 1`864
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 10 8007800
Pros and Cons: Renault Laguna has
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv