Renault Laguna 2012 vs Kia Cerato 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 205 HP | 126 - 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 340 NM | 157 - 194 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 11.9 seconds | 9.3 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 8.7 | 6.7 - 7.8 | |
|
Renault Laguna petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Cerato. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is larger. Renault Laguna is 16 cm longer than the Kia Cerato, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 423 litres | 440 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Laguna has 17 litres less trunk space than the Kia Cerato. This could mean that the Renault Laguna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Cerato, which means Renault Laguna can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`926 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |