Renault Laguna 2010 vs Ford Mondeo 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 180 HP | 115 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 400 NM | 159 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 12.2 seconds | 7.8 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.7 | 5.3 - 7.9 | |
|
Renault Laguna petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Mondeo. On average, Renault Laguna equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is smaller. Renault Laguna is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1680 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Laguna has 19 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The Ford Mondeo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Renault Laguna can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`021 | ~ 2`238 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |