Renault Laguna 2010 vs Renault Megane 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Renault Laguna
2010 - 2013
Renault Megane
2012 - 2013
Body: HatchbackEstate car / wagon
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.5 - 2.01.2 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 110 - 180 HP90 - 220 HP
Torque: 195 - 400 NM148 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 - 12.1 seconds7.6 - 12.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.7 - 8.73.5 - 7.7
Renault Laguna petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. On average, Renault Laguna equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.56 m
Width: 1.81 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Renault Laguna is larger, but slightly lower.
Renault Laguna is 14 cm longer than the Renault Megane, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Laguna is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 450 litres524 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1595 litres
Renault Megane has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Renault Laguna has 74 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. This could mean that the Renault Laguna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Megane.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`994~ 1`875
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

low
Average price (€): 42005000
Pros and Cons: Renault Laguna has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Renault Megane has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv