Renault Laguna 2010 vs Mazda 6 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 180 HP | 120 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 400 NM | 165 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 12.1 seconds | 8.4 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 8.7 | 5.2 - 8.0 | |
|
Renault Laguna petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6. On average, Renault Laguna equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Laguna is 6 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1702 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Renault Laguna has 60 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Renault Laguna can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`994 | ~ 2`021 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |