Renault Laguna 2010 vs Renault Scenic 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 180 HP | 110 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 400 NM | 151 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 12.1 seconds | 9.1 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 8.7 | 4.1 - 8.1 | |
|
Renault Laguna petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic. On average, Renault Laguna equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.64 m | |
| Renault Laguna is 33 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1870 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Laguna has 20 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. This could mean that the Renault Laguna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`994 | ~ 1`995 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |