Renault Laguna 2010 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Renault Laguna
2010 - 2013
Renault Grand Scenic
2012 - 2013
Body: HatchbackMinivan / MPV
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.5 - 2.01.2 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 110 - 180 HP110 - 140 HP
Torque: 195 - 400 NM151 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 - 12.1 seconds10.5 - 13.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.7 - 8.74.1 - 8.1
Renault Laguna petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Grand Scenic. On average, Renault Laguna equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.57 m
Width: 1.81 m1.85 m
Height: 1.45 m1.65 m
Renault Laguna is 12 cm longer than the Renault Grand Scenic, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 20 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 450 litres645 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2063 litres
Renault Grand Scenic has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Renault Laguna has 195 litres less trunk space than the Renault Grand Scenic. This could mean that the Renault Laguna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Grand Scenic.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`994~ 2`197
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 42004600
Pros and Cons: Renault Laguna has
  • lower price
Renault Grand Scenic has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv