Renault Laguna 2010 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 - 180 HP | 110 - 140 HP | |
Torque: | 195 - 400 NM | 151 - 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 12.1 seconds | 10.5 - 13.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 8.7 | 4.1 - 8.1 | |
Renault Laguna petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Grand Scenic. On average, Renault Laguna equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.65 m | |
Renault Laguna is 12 cm longer than the Renault Grand Scenic, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 20 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 645 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2063 litres | |
Renault Grand Scenic has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Laguna has 195 litres less trunk space than the Renault Grand Scenic. This could mean that the Renault Laguna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Grand Scenic. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`994 | ~ 2`197 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3800 | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |