Peugeot 407 2004 vs Alfa Romeo 166 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 385 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 407 engine produces 39 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 166, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Alfa Romeo 166. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 407 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 8.9 | |
|
The Peugeot 407 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 407 consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 166, which means that by driving the Peugeot 407 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 407 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 407 is 4 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 166, 1 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 407 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 407 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Alfa Romeo 166, which means Peugeot 407 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 407 has
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has
| |