Peugeot 407 2008 vs Volvo S60 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 407 engine produces 97 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 407 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.0 | |
|
The Peugeot 407 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 407 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Peugeot 407 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Peugeot 407 is larger. Peugeot 407 is 11 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 1 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 407 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 424 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1034 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Peugeot 407 has 17 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S60. This could mean that the Peugeot 407 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 407 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |