Peugeot 407 2004 vs Volvo V50 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 217 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 407 engine produces 18 HP more power than Volvo V50, but torque is 3 NM less than Volvo V50. Despite the higher power, Peugeot 407 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 9.2 | |
| Peugeot 407 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 407 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo V50 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Citroen C8, Peugeot 607 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo S40, Volvo S70 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo V50 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volvo V50 2004 2.4 engine: The strengths of this engine lie in its durable components, long lifespan, reliability in everyday use, and substantial power reserves.
However, there are notable weaknesses. Early models were equipped ... More about Volvo V50 2004 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Peugeot 407 is larger. Peugeot 407 is 25 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 4 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 407 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1365 litres | 1307 litres | |
|
Peugeot 407 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 407 has 72 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 407 (by 58 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 407 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V50, which means Peugeot 407 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`195 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 6.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 407 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |