Peugeot 407 2004 vs Volvo V50 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 407 and Volvo V50 have the same engine power, but Peugeot 407 torque is 20 NM less than Volvo V50. Peugeot 407 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 407 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 407 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 407 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
1200 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
880 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Peugeot 407 2004 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Peugeot 407 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.45 m | |
Peugeot 407 is larger. Peugeot 407 is 25 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 4 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 407 is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 417 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1365 litres | 1307 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 407 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V50, which means Peugeot 407 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`850 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 6.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 407 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |