Peugeot 407 2004 vs Ford Mondeo 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 407 engine produces 46 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 407 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 407 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 407 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Peugeot 407 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 407 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 1080 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 407 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen Xsara Picasso | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 407 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.44 m | |
| Peugeot 407 is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 407 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1365 litres | 1700 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Peugeot 407 has 51 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 335 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 407 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Peugeot 407 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`125 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Ford Mondeo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 407, so Ford Mondeo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 407 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |