Peugeot 407 2008 vs Mazda 6 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 407 engine produces 7 HP more power than Mazda 6, but torque is 20 NM less than Mazda 6. Despite the higher power, Peugeot 407 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 407 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 407 could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 407 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Peugeot 407 2008 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Peugeot 407 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 407 is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 448 litres | 519 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1751 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Peugeot 407 has 71 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 407 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`215 | 2`135 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 407 has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 407 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |