Peugeot 407 2008 vs Volvo V70 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Peugeot 407 and Volvo V70 have the same engine power, but Peugeot 407 torque is 30 NM less than Volvo V70. Peugeot 407 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Peugeot 407 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 407 could require 225 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 407 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1550 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1700 km on highway | ||
| 1040 km with real consumption | 1060 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Peugeot 407 2008 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Peugeot 407 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Peugeot 407 is smaller. Peugeot 407 is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 407 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 448 litres | 575 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Peugeot 407 has 127 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 407 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo V70. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`195 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volvo V70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 407 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volvo V70, so Volvo V70 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 407 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |