Peugeot 407 2008 vs Renault Laguna 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Peugeot 407 engine produces 14 HP less power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Renault Laguna. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 407 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Peugeot 407 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 407 could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 407 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1490 km on highway | ||
| 1040 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 407 2008 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Peugeot 407 2008 2.0 engine Renault Laguna 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.45 m | |
| Peugeot 407 is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Laguna, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 407 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 448 litres | 508 litres | |
|
Renault Laguna has more luggage space. Peugeot 407 has 60 litres less trunk space than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 407 is 1 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Peugeot 407 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`195 | 2`051 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Renault Laguna has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 407 has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Renault Laguna, so Renault Laguna quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 407 has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |