Peugeot 407 2005 vs Honda Civic 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.7 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 - 211 HP | 120 - 125 HP | |
Torque: | 220 - 440 NM | 152 - 154 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 10.1 seconds | 9.6 - 11.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 10.2 | 6.8 - 7.3 | |
Peugeot 407 petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.82 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
Peugeot 407 is larger. Peugeot 407 is 34 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 18 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 441 litres | |
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Peugeot 407 has 41 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. This could mean that the Peugeot 407 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 407 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Honda Civic, which means Peugeot 407 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`010 | ~ 1`583 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 1600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 8.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 407 has
|
Honda Civic has
| |